- Churchover solar
- Churchover turbines
- Wolvey Wolf turbines
- Copston Magna turbines
- The Arguments
- Response to McAlpine/RES
- Wind Economics
- Property Values
- Noise & Health
- Landscape Assessment
- Ecology & Wildlife
- CPRE new windfarm report
- Recommended Reading
- Sources of Information
- About Us
- BBC bias on climate change
- Latest News
- Climate change balance lost by BBC
- Energy Prices-The Times
- Turbines trash landscape benefit billionaires
- Global Warming Panic Over!
- Mini-Nukes the future
- The dirty secret of Britain's power madness
- Extreme weather the new Global Warming
- Tax Payers Alliance Energy view
- Britain can't afford wind power
- Fracking = prosperity?
- Its time to drill- Times leader
- Thoughtful article on Fracking
- Wind double subsidised
- Deluded energy policy
- The EU U-turn over energy
- Windfarm Wars Company in Churchover
- New noise guidance increases risk of harm
- Peter Lilley MP, Delingpole's new hero
- Shale Gas update 2013
- Maggie U-turned on Global Warming
- Devastatingly sad news
- 'smart' energy technology
- Engineers surveyed 2011
- Lord Turnbull speaks out
- Miracle shale gas
- Planning application refused!
- Warwickshire heritage beauty spot protected!
- How To Help
- Letters of Objection
- New Churchover PC Objection
- New Historic England Objection
- Churchover Resident Objection
- CPRE Objection
- English Heritage Objection
- Objection by expert R&F historian
- Leicestershire County Council objection
- Warwicks CC Ecology objection
- Harborough District Objection
- Churchover PC Objection
- Bitteswell PC Objection
- Pailton PC objection
- Some other Objections sent
- Rugby BC Planning Committee
- Contact Us
Rugby Borough Council refuses permission for Churchover windfarm!
Submitted by Admin on Sun, 09/11/2011 - 16:58
Residents around Churchover are joyously celebrating after Rugby Borough Council's Planning Committee unanimously refused to grant permission for the proposed wind power station near Churchover.
The Committee toured the site during the afternoon of Wednesday 7th September 2011 and its discussions that evening showed that Councillors considered the environmental harm from the giant turbines would substantially outweigh any benefits from any renewable energy that might be generated.
Councillors were especially concerned about harm to the landscape, unacceptable visual impact upon nearby residents, and damage to the historic buildings and conservation area in Churchover and elsewhere in this part of the Swift Valley. At the meeting other concerns were voiced, especially the objections from Coventry Airport and NATS (National Air Traffic Services) on the grounds of air safety, and from Warwickshire County Council's archaeological specialists who feared damage to the deserted medieval village of Cestersover and associated historic Ridge and Furrow.
A delighted Lorne Smith, leader of the campaign group ASWAR, which seeks to protect rural communities around Rugby from windfarm developments, said yesterday:
It is excellent news that the windfarm has been refused, and we are very grateful to all Councillors, our MP and MEP, and all the residents of the Revel area, for their tremendous support.
However, winning a great battle is not the same as winning a war. We will continue to remain vigilant. Another Scottish energy company, Scottish Power has recently decided not to appeal against two nearby refusals in the low-wind midlands and we are hopeful that Scottish and Southern Energy will also realise it is not worth wasting more money pursuing the destruction of the lives of this tiny but important community and one of Warwickshire’s historic beauty spots.