- Churchover solar
- Churchover turbines
- Wolvey Wolf turbines
- Copston Magna turbines
- The Arguments
- Response to McAlpine/RES
- Wind Economics
- Property Values
- Noise & Health
- Landscape Assessment
- Ecology & Wildlife
- CPRE new windfarm report
- Recommended Reading
- Sources of Information
- About Us
- BBC bias on climate change
- Latest News
- Climate change balance lost by BBC
- Energy Prices-The Times
- Turbines trash landscape benefit billionaires
- Global Warming Panic Over!
- Mini-Nukes the future
- The dirty secret of Britain's power madness
- Extreme weather the new Global Warming
- Tax Payers Alliance Energy view
- Britain can't afford wind power
- Fracking = prosperity?
- Its time to drill- Times leader
- Thoughtful article on Fracking
- Wind double subsidised
- Deluded energy policy
- The EU U-turn over energy
- Windfarm Wars Company in Churchover
- New noise guidance increases risk of harm
- Peter Lilley MP, Delingpole's new hero
- Shale Gas update 2013
- Maggie U-turned on Global Warming
- Devastatingly sad news
- 'smart' energy technology
- Engineers surveyed 2011
- Lord Turnbull speaks out
- Miracle shale gas
- Planning application refused!
- Warwickshire heritage beauty spot protected!
- How To Help
- Letters of Objection
- New Churchover PC Objection
- New Historic England Objection
- Churchover Resident Objection
- CPRE Objection
- English Heritage Objection
- Objection by expert R&F historian
- Leicestershire County Council objection
- Warwicks CC Ecology objection
- Harborough District Objection
- Churchover PC Objection
- Bitteswell PC Objection
- Pailton PC objection
- Some other Objections sent
- Rugby BC Planning Committee
- Contact Us
Bias in Rugby windfarm landscape capacity study
Submitted by Editor on Fri, 04/15/2011 - 17:44
ASWAR calls for bias to be stuck from Rugby Borough's windfarm landscape capacity report.
The Rugby Borough have just published the final report of a windfarm landscape capacity study they commissioned from The White Partnership, based in Cardiff.
ASWAR understands the report is not yet Rugby Borough policy and will go before the cabinet in April for formal endorsement.
ASWAR’s view is :-
“Are the Rugby Borough consultants in league with the windfarm developers?
ASWAR calls upon Rugby Borough to reconsider their windfarm landscape capacity study for its illogicality and innate bias.
On the one hand it acknowedges:
“The Swift valley accommodates a mature, sinuous river course and has a well defined change in level in the steeper slopes below Churchover….. The High Cross plateau...is predominantly Green Belt which is a significant restraint on development.
Wind energy development would be less compatible… in valleys especially where juxtaposed with defined changes in level ...and elements like ridge and furrow…and it would affect views to the listed church and spire (Churchover), diminishing its scale and affecting its context including the conservation area …. and replace this as a focal point in the landscape.”
On the other hand it says:
Churchover and High Cross are “potentially realistic sites because of developer interest” !
Since when should ‘developer interest’ be a factor in a neutral, objective, scientific analysis?
(It does add that any cluster of turbines would need to “minimise the effects on Churchover, the character of the Swift Valley and the cumulative effects in conjunction with the Swinford windfarm”. The fact that the villages of Cotesbach and Shawell will also be ‘hemmed-in by a windfarm landscape’ if a cluster is built at Churchover, is totally ignored perhaps because they are outside the Rugby Borough’s boundary across the A5.)
ASWAR welcomes aspects of this report with regard to the communities around Rugby and specifically the report’s own analysis showing the Swift Valley as incompatible with wind energy development.
Nevertheless ASWAR is appalled that the consultants feel that ‘Developer interest’ should affect the appropriateness of a potential site and calls for Rugby Borough to throw out any suggestion of this bias and strike it from the report.”